判例与裁决 · 出现 1

Avena案:外交保护与混合请求

Avena: Diplomatic Protection and Mixed Claims

本单元进度 · STAGES0 / 4
国籍、无国籍、难民与外交保护出现 1 届 · 2026
STAGE 01

规范依据

NORMATIVE BASIS规范命题、原文与来源 · Rule and sources收起 · Collapse展开 · Expand
Avena direct and protected claims本站中文译文
中文文本 · Chinese text

Avena确认,在国家权利与个人权利相互依存的特殊情形下,国家可以以自身名义提出同时涉及直接权利和个人权利的请求;当地救济耗尽义务不适用于该请求。

英文原文 · English text
Avena recognized that, in special circumstances where State and individual rights are interdependent, a State may submit a claim in its own name covering direct and individual rights; the duty to exhaust local remedies did not apply to that request.
中文译文 · Chinese translation

只有在该程序完成并穷尽当地救济后,墨西哥才可通过外交保护程序提出其国民的个人请求;然而,本案墨西哥并不主张自己仅以这一基础行事。

英文原文 · English

Only when that process is completed and local remedies are exhausted would Mexico be entitled to espouse the individual claims of its nationals through the procedure of diplomatic protection. In the present case Mexico does not, however, claim to be acting solely on that basis.

中文译文 · Chinese translation

墨西哥还提出自身请求,依据是其主张美国违反第36条义务直接并通过其国民给墨西哥自身造成的损害。

英文原文 · English

It also asserts its own claims, basing them on the injury which it contends that it has itself suffered, directly and through its nationals, as a result of the violation by the United States of the obligations incumbent upon it under Article 36.

读完本段了?

标记后,四段进度条与首页复习清单会同步更新。